ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Investigating the health and safety condition of the care environment of primary schools based on crisis prevention approach.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Investigating the health and safety condition of the care environment of primary schools based on crisis prevention approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSafety and health issues need to be prioritized by schools. A safe environment in schools is one of the primary goals of the education system. Evaluation of educational environments with an approach to crisis prevention and coping is of particular importance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the state of the care environment of government primary schools with a health and safety approach in Zabol, Iran. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe present study was descriptive cross-sectional. This study was conducted in government primary schools in Zabol, Iran (2023). The sampling method was available and there were a total of 35 schools that were selected. The tool used to be the school-age care environment rating scale (SACERS) checklist. These checklists were completed by the researchers after observing the current situation in the schools. The SPSS v25 software was used for data statistical analysis (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and t-tests).
resultsThe highest score relates to health policies, and the safety measures obtained the lowest score. Health measures, safety measures, attendance, departure, and meals studied are far from the required standards. There was a significant difference between the average safety and health of schools and the required standards (t = -8.19,
conclusionThe evaluation of schools in eight components of safety and health shows that schools need more attention to be ready to deal with emergencies and crises. The lack of comprehensive, valid tools and inadequate monitoring can be effective factors in the nonstandard condition of schools. Schools need intervention to improve and eliminate deficiencies in terms of safety and health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.