ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025
Allergic sensitization in the tropics: unravelling co-sensitization between crustacean and mites.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crustacean allergy, a common food allergy triggered by immune reactions to proteins in shrimp, lobster, and crab, involves over ten identified allergenic proteins and can lead to severe symptoms, including anaphylaxis. Shellfish-allergic individuals are often sensitized to house dust mites (HDM), yet the specific interrelationships remain unclear. This study analyzed 93 seafood-allergic individuals and selected 54 subjects with positive skin prick tests and/or ImmunoCAP-measured specific IgE to crustaceans. Allergy Explorer 2 (ALEX2) testing was subsequently performed for these individuals. The most reactive mite allergens (in total over 81%), included Der p 1, Der p 2, Der p 23, Der f 1, Der f 2, Gly d 2, and Lep d 2. Der p 23 alone was identified in over 61% of crustacean allergic subjects. Anaphylaxis was reported in 11 subjects, correlating strongly with IgE sensitization to tropomyosin (63.6%), but also to Lep d 2 and Der p 23 (both 54.5%). These findings stress the complex sensitization patterns in crustacean-mite allergic individuals in the tropics, highlighting both tropomyosin and non-tropomyosin cross- and co-reactivity. The significant IgE reactivity to Der p 23 and arginine kinase suggests the need for enhanced diagnostic approaches and further investigation into the clinical implications of these sensitization patterns in crustacean and mite sensitised individuals for improved allergy management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.