ArticleBioMed research international2025
Automated Technique for Brain Tumor Detection From Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Local Features, Ensemble Classification, and YOLOv3.
Article in BioMed research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PINN-FFD: physics- and frequency-informed one-stage detector for brain tumor detection in MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Automated Technique for Brain Tumor Detection From Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Local Features, Ensemble Classification, and YOLOv3.BioMed research international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, the researcher explores an automated approach for detecting a brain tumor using MRI scans of the brain. In underdeveloped countries, many people are dying due to the slow detection process and other negligence of radiologists. People suffer from these diseases due to the slow process of recognition. Since the number of patients is greater than that of radiologists, there is the possibility of human error, which can cause serious damage. The detection of tumors from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is an important manual task, specifically in terms of the time that the radiologist performs. In this study, the researchers sought to study state-of-the-art techniques to detect normal brain and brain tumors from MRI using machine learning techniques. The main objective of this study is to develop a novel automated technique for brain tumor detection. Through the worldwide consideration of practical literature, it is clear that traditional approaches are insufficient to resolve all uncertainties and problems. Therefore, a novel approach to examining MRI must be adapted. This study proposes two different novel techniques: one that uses ensemble classification and the other that makes use of the deep learning model of YOLOv3. In ensemble classification, two classification algorithms are used which are support vector machine (SVM) and K-nearest neighbors (KNNs). The YOLOv3 model is used to detect and outline tumor locations in the images. This study used an open-source dataset and data collected from hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan. The ensemble classifier achieved an overall accuracy of 80.50%, while the YOLOv3 model achieved higher performance with 97.80% accuracy, 97.40% precision, 98.18% recall, and a mean intersection over union (IoU) score of 0.65. These results confirm that YOLOv3 is a useful technique for identifying brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.