ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Adverse events leading to discontinuation of daptomycin versus vancomycin in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serious Adverse Events and Laboratory Monitoring Regimens for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy With Daptomycin.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the adverse event rates between daptomycin and vancomycin in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) setting. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with vancomycin or daptomycin in OPAT. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Vancomycin was dosed using Bayesian kinetics software to achieve a goal AUC of 400-600 mg h/L and daptomycin was a weight-based dose. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an adverse event resulting in a change in antimicrobial therapy or early discontinuation due to harm or injury. Secondary outcomes included measurement of time to adverse event occurrence and time in therapeutic range for the vancomycin group. The primary outcome was analyzed using a chi-square test. Results: A total of 175 patients were included, with 112 in the daptomycin group and 63 in the vancomycin group. The primary outcome of early discontinuation of OPAT therapy was not statistically different between the daptomycin and vancomycin groups [15/112 (13%) versus 9/63 (14%); Conclusions: When comparing the rate of early discontinuation between daptomycin and vancomycin in OPAT, there was no significant difference between groups. These findings suggest that either agent may be considered in the OPAT setting depending on patient-specific factors. Dosing of vancomycin using Bayesian model dosing software may have led to a reduction of adverse events in the vancomycin group.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.