Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321584›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Antimicrobial resistance and natural alternatives:

Ádám Kerek, Attila Yurt, Ábel Szabó, Barbara Tuska-Szalay, Ákos Jerzsele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ádám KerekDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila YurtDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Ábel SzabóDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Barbara Tuska-SzalayDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Ákos JerzseleDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical One Health challenge affecting both human and animal health. Methods: This Results: Propolis showed promising activity, with an MLC of 1.25 mg/ mL for feline isolates and 0.16 mg/mL for bovine isolates after 48 h. Ronidazole demonstrated reduced efficacy against feline isolates (MLC 32 μg/mL), suggesting partial resistance, whereas bovine isolates remained susceptible (MLC 1 μg/mL). Discussion: Our findings highlight propolis as a potential alternative treatment for

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebovine trichomoniasisfeline trichomonosisnatural antimicrobialsOne HealthpropolisTritrichomonas foetus

Identifiers

PMID41321584
PMCPMC12662178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.