ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Machine learning-based clinical mastitis detection in dairy cows using milk electrical conductivity and somatic cell count.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infrared Thermography and Machine Learning for Mastitis Detection in Dairy Cows: A Pilot Case Study in Egyptian Farms.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Next-Generation Dairy Systems: From Sensors to Smart Processing.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Integrating biomarkers and artificial intelligence for precision diagnostics in cattle health and herd management: a review.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of subclinical mastitis in large-scale dairy herds using a locally established somatic cell count threshold.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine mastitis, a prevalent disease causing substantial economic losses in dairy production, requires accurate and robust detection methods. Traditional threshold-based approaches using electrical conductivity (EC) are limited by low specificity and farm-specific variability. While somatic cell count (SCC) offers a more reliable biomarker for intramammary inflammation, current SCC sensors often yield imprecise data and are costly to implement, resulting in a lack of accurate, quantitative, and widely applicable models for mastitis monitoring. This study presents an machine learning-based diagnostic framework integrating logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), and feedforward neural networks (FNN) to evaluate mastitis detection performance with EC, SCC, and their combined inputs. Using data from 93 cows across four dairy farms, we demonstrate that SCC-based models consistently outperform EC-based approaches. The SVM model achieved 95.6% accuracy and 100% sensitivity when utilizing SCC as input feature. The FNN model attained the highest AUC (0.981), highlighting neural networks' capability to capture complex patterns. Although the addition of EC to SCC did not improve performance across all metrics, it showed potential to enhance robustness in contexts where accurate SCC data are limited. These findings underscore the diagnostic superiority of SCC and the potential of tailored machine learning solutions in modern dairy production settings. Future work should focus on expanding datasets across multiple regions and integrating high-precision SCC sensors for real-time deployment in automated detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.