Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321574›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Comparative epidemiological analysis of tumors of the digestive system in dogs and cats.

Diana Araújo, Gabriela Fernanades da Silva, Fátima Carvalho, Nuno Vale, João Niza-Ribeiro, Ana Isabel Ribeiro, Irina Amorim, Katia Pinello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diana AraújoDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Gabriela Fernanades da SilvaDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Fátima CarvalhoDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Nuno ValePerMed Research Group, Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal.
João Niza-RibeiroVet-OncoNet, Population Studies Department, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Isabel RibeiroEPIUnit ITR, Institute of Public Health of the University Porto, University of Porto (ISPUP), Porto, Portugal.
Irina AmorimDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Katia PinelloVet-OncoNet, Population Studies Department, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are a leading reason for veterinary care. Methods: This study analyzed digestive tract tumors in dogs and cats in Portugal using data from the Vet-OncoNet database, focusing on frequency, risk factors, and geographic distribution. Results and discussion: A total of 1,213 cases were included: 617 dogs (50.9%) and 596 cats (49.1%), with a higher proportion of males (54.9%) than females (45.1%). The most affected organs overall were the small intestine (26.5%) and liver/intrahepatic bile ducts (16.7%). In dogs, tumors were mainly located in the liver and bile ducts (25.8%), rectum (19.0%), small intestine (13.8%), and stomach (8.9%). In cats, the small intestine was the primary site (39.6%), followed by liver/bile ducts (7.4%), stomach (7.3%), and colon (3.5%). Lymphoma was the most common tumor type in both species (42.2%), followed by adenocarcinoma (19.0%). Among dogs, mixed breeds, Labrador Retrievers, German Shepherds, and French Bulldogs were most affected. In cats, Common European, mixed-breed, and Norwegian Forest cats predominated. The incidence rate (IR) of digestive tumors was 3.5 times higher in cats than dogs. Male cats had a 1.5 times higher IR than females. Cats also had 16 times higher risk for GI lymphoma and twice the risk for adenocarcinoma compared to dogs. Certain dog breeds, including West Highland White Terrier, Siberian Husky, and Golden Retriever, showed higher tumor incidence. Spatial analysis revealed concentration in urbanized areas, particularly around Porto and Lisbon. Conclusion: These findings highlight notable species-specific differences in digestive tract tumors, suggesting distinct genetic predispositions and possible environmental influences.

Indexed as

catscomparative oncologydigestive tract neoplasmsdogsepidemiologyVet-OncoNet

Identifiers

PMID41321574
PMCPMC12661348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.