ArticleJAMIA open2025
Span-based annotation framework for LLM-based clinical named entity recognition: development and validation using Korean emergency department notes.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop and validate of a span-based annotation framework for clinical named entity recognition (NER) using large language models (LLMs) based on Korean emergency department clinical notes. Materials and Methods: Two datasets with the same entity types but different annotation spans (word- vs phrase-level) were constructed, with the phrase-level dataset further was expanded into a doubled version. A Korean language-specific LLM was fine-tuned on each dataset, producing three variants that were compared with two baseline models, few-shot LLM and fine-tuned small language model (SLM). The final variant fine-tuned on the doubled phrase-level dataset was further evaluated against a human annotator. Results: In all experimental settings, three variants outperformed the baselines by achieving the highest F1 scores across all metrics. The final variant achieved F1 scores exceeding 0.80 across all averaging strategies and evaluation metrics, including token-based, span-based exact, and span-based partial evaluations demonstrating its robustness applicable in a practical setting. Discussion: While prompt engineering with few-shot is widely adopted for LLM-based clinical NER, our results proved that supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is consistently superior. The final variant outperformed the human annotator, emphasizing its potential as an automatic labeling tool. Conclusion: This study introduced a novel span-based annotation framework for LLM-based clinical NER verified by three independent experiments. In multilingual and real-world clinical settings, LLMs have proven in handling complex entity spans that include word-level and phrase-level annotations, particularly for long and attribute-rich entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.