Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321559›Full record

ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology

Extraction of Magnetic Intraocular Foreign Bodies Using a Novel Magnetic Foreign Body Extractor: 2 Cases.

Xuhua Zhao, Xinyue Zhu, Chunyu Liang, Pengyi Zhou, Kunpeng Xie, Bo Jin, Haiyan Zhu, Fuzhen Li, Yuying Wang, Leite Shi and 5 more

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xuhua ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Xinyue ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Chunyu LiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Pengyi ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Kunpeng XieDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Bo JinDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Haiyan ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Fuzhen LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuying WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Leite ShiDepartment of Medical Information, The First Affliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Bo LeiHenan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Institute, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaofeng WangSchool of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Liping DuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuemin JinDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Province Eye Hospital, Henan International Joint Research Laboratory for Ocular Immunology and Retinal Injury Repair, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The extraction of intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) presents a significant challenge in ocular surgery. This report introduces a novel magnetic foreign body extractor, specifically designed for the removal of small- to medium-sized magnetic IOFBs located in the posterior segment of the eye. Case Presentations: Our report presents 2 cases of IOFB removal using a novel magnetic foreign body extractor, performed in conjunction with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). The IOFBs were successfully removed through corneal or limbal incisions with a 23-gauge rechargeable magnetic foreign body extractor, without the need to enlarge the scleral incision. All procedures were completed independently, without the use of additional instruments, resulting in no instances of iatrogenic retinal injury, vitreous incarceration, or postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Furthermore, both patients showed significant visual improvement, with best-corrected visual acuity improving from counting fingers preoperatively to 0.6 and 0.7 at the 1-month follow-up. Conclusion: The magnetizable intraocular magnetic foreign body extractor, in combination with minimally invasive vitrectomy techniques, offers a safe and effective solution for the removal of magnetic IOFBs in the posterior segment of the eye. This approach not only enhances visual acuity but also reduces the risk of postoperative complications, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool in ocular trauma management.

Indexed as

Intraocular foreign bodyMagnetic foreign body extractorMicroincisionOcular trauma

Identifiers

PMID41321559
PMCPMC12659014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.