ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Neovascular Maculopathy after Laser Retinal Rejuvenation Therapy in a Young Myopic Patient: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Laser photobiomodulation, including retinal rejuvenation therapy (2RT), is a system which selectively targets the retinal pigment epithelium by a concise 3 ns pulse duration. The advantage of this laser system over the traditional thermal laser is that the pulsed, very short duration laser effects can be titrated as spatially confined photodisruptors without resultant conductive thermal spread and therefore collateral damage. It has been investigated primarily in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), particularly in decreasing drusen and slowing the rate of AMD progression. In this case, we have described a case of neovascular maculopathy occurring shortly after 2RT in a young myopic patient. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 28-year-old male who presented with unilateral visual impairment following laser 2RT. Two months before, he was subjected to photorefractive keratectomy for moderate myopia (-3.00 D). The baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging revealed "sharp-peaked" pigment epithelium detachment (PED) in the subfoveal area. Fluorescein angiography indicated a focal area of irregular foveal hyperfluorescence. Observation was advised, and laser 2RT was performed. However, 1 month later, the patient developed a neovascular lesion in the same eye, confirmed by OCT-angiography, requiring urgent intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy. Conclusions: In summary, this case illustrates a progressive maculopathy culminating in choroidal neovascularization triggered by laser 2RT in a young myopic patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.