ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
The Value of Detecting and Monitoring ctDNA in Uveal Melanoma: Results of a Pilot Study and a Systematic Review.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precision Oncology in Ocular Melanoma: Integrating Molecular and Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This article presents the results of a prospective pilot study on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring in uveal melanoma (UM) patients, along with a systematic review of the literature to support and contextualize the findings. We investigated the clinical utility of ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) for early detection of tumor progression. Case Presentations: We performed serial ctDNA testing using the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 and Ion Proton™ sequencing in 3 UM patients (two recurrent, one nonrecurrent) at four time points over 2 years. A systematic review of studies up to June 2024 was also conducted, identifying 32 additional UM patients. In recurrent patients, co-occurring mutations in Conclusion: Serial ctDNA analysis may serve as a noninvasive tool for early detection of recurrence in UM. Co-occurrence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.