Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321516›Full record

ReviewAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2025

Strategic technologies to improve phytogenic feed additive efficacy in pigs and poultry.

Carlos W T Nantapo, Upenyu Marume

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of anVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Dietary Combined Thyme Meal andVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carlos W T NantapoDepartment of Animal Sciences, School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology, North-West University, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa.
Upenyu MarumeDepartment of Animal Sciences, School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology, North-West University, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytogenic feed additives (PFA) are a diverse group of plant-derived materials that have gained considerable interest and use over the last few years in the food and agriculture industry. This is due to the banning of the use of antibiotic growth promoters, as well as an abundance of natural compounds with several perceived beneficial properties. PFA boast a wide range of physiology influencing properties including growth enhancement, stimulating feed intake, appetite and endogenous secretions, antiviral, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory activities. However, despite the demonstrated potential of PFA and their phytochemical constituents in vitro, several technical limitations restrict their use and commercialisation in monogastric diets. Strategies to improve the bioavailability of phytic acid in pig and poultry diets are described, including encapsulation, feed enzymes, fermentation, cocktails and blends of phytogenics, blending PFA with organic acids and feed enzyme inclusion. The objective of this review article is to complement the body of knowledge considering new scientific evidence. In addition, the review describes some scientific techniques developed to improve the bioaccessibility and bioavailability and facilitate the application of PFA in pig and poultry nutrition.

Indexed as

EncapsulationFeed enzymeFermentationOrganic acidPhytogenic

Identifiers

PMID41321516
PMCPMC12664070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.