ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Ultrasound as a Foundational Tool in Medical Education: A Literature Review.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward a sustainable model for novice ultrasound training: mixed-methods analysis of student portfolios and objective outcomes in Korean Medicine.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Better teaching in the ICU: from educational principles to case-based, visualization-guided, and AI-enhanced training infrastructure.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Ultrasound Knowledge and Perceptions Questionnaire (UKPQ) Among Health Professions Students.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- A Blended Case-Based and Practical Training Framework for Graduate Ultrasound Education: A Perspective on Competency-Based Instruction.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Clinician Led Point of Care Ultrasound Workshops for Anatomy Instruction: A Pilot Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of ultrasound into undergraduate medical education (UGME) has garnered increasing attention due to its potential to enhance clinical training; however, a standardized framework for its implementation and curricular standards has yet to be established. This study aims to review how medical schools have implemented ultrasound training, evaluate its benefits in helping students develop clinical decision-making skills, and identify barriers that limit its broader adoption. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published between 1993 and 2025, focusing on curricula design, implementation strategies, educational outcomes, and challenges. Results show that early and longitudinal exposure to ultrasound improves students' understanding of anatomy, strengthens clinical reasoning, and increases preparedness for residency; however, curricular time constraints, faculty training gaps, and financial barriers continue to deter some programs from introducing ultrasound curriculum early. While growing evidence supports the value of ultrasound in UGME, adoption remains inconsistent, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based frameworks to ensure equitable access and skill development across institutions. Future efforts should focus on developing and implementing national standards that promote consistent and uniform integration of ultrasound training into UGME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.