Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321485›Full record

ArticleCogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference2025

Development in the comprehension of phonetically reduced spoken words.

Caroline Beech, Megan Shelton, Daniel Swingley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline BeechDepartment of Psychology, 425 S. University Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
Megan SheltonDepartment of Psychology, 425 S. University Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
Daniel SwingleyDepartment of Psychology, 425 S. University Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.

Funding

Cross-disciplinary training in computational approaches to the neuroscience of audition and communicationT32DC016903 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Vijay Balasubramanian, Yale E Cohen · 2018 to 2026
$1.4M
Infant word learning and word recognition under realistic phonetic conditionsF31HD113235 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEECH, CAROLINE WENDELL · 2024 to 2025
$88k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD113235NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC016903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The speech young children hear is highly variable. For example, reduced pronunciations, where some sounds in the canonical pronunciation are naturally dropped or altered, are common even in speech to children. The present study employed a new story-guided looking method (a variation on language-guided looking) to create felicitous conditions for testing young children's recognition of reduced pronunciations of familiar words. Experiment 1 (18-24 months, n=32) found that toddlers succeeded at recognizing clear pronunciations, but failed to recognize reduced pronunciations, even in repetition trials when target words were preceded by a clear mention of the same word in the previous sentence. In Experiment 2, 3-year-olds (35-39 months, n=17 out of 44 pre-registered, ongoing) succeeded at recognizing reduced pronunciations, and benefited from preceding repetition. Overall, these results demonstrate a powerful new method for studying children's language comprehension under more naturalistic conditions, and highlight an important psycholinguistic development over the 2-3 year span.

Indexed as

language acquisitionpronunciation variabilityreductionword recognition

Identifiers

PMID41321485
PMCPMC12662738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.