ArticleDepression and anxiety2025
Depression Recognition Using Machine Learning Algorithms With Eye Tracking, Visual Evoked Potentials, and Auditory P300 Among Chinese Medical Students.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current assessment of depression primarily relies on psychological scales. Although the use of machine learning in depression has grown, limited reports are available on multiple neurophysiological measurements. We employed machine learning algorithms incorporating eye tracking, visual evoked potentials (VEPs), and auditory P300 to classify depression among Chinese medical students. Methods: A total of 66 students with depression and 72 matched controls were recruited; eye tracking, VEPs, and auditory P300 data were collected. Descriptive analyses and group comparisons were performed between the depression and control groups. Then, multivariate logistic regression (LR) analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between eye tracking, VEPs, and auditory P300 features and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores. Furthermore, the study employed six classifiers to differentiate between depression and nondepression. Five-fold cross-validation was employed. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), precision, accuracy, recall, and F1 score. We applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to explain the model. Results: Depression group was characterized by lower response search scores, higher Conclusions: Chinese medical students with depression exhibited reduced responsive search scores and extended P100 latencies, suggesting impairments in attention and visual information processing associated with depression. The combined eye tracking and VEPs proved to be more effective than single features for distinguishing depression and nondepression. P100 latency in the right eye may be the most significant predictor of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.