ArticleUrban forestry & urban greening2025
Urban forestry practices to improve heat-related human health: exploring the practicalities and concerns with U.S. urban tree professionals.
Article in Urban forestry & urban greening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing the structure of urban woody plantings for a warming climate: a frequency-weighted exposure framework for woody species in Chongqing, China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change is increasing the frequency of heat waves and heat-related health issues, particularly in cities due to the urban heat island effect. While government entities see the value of utilizing the urban forest (UF) to reduce heat exposure in cities, practical and community-based considerations focused on UF heat mitigation are poorly understood. To address this gap, this study conducted 34 interviews with urban tree professionals (e.g., city arborists, UF researchers, non-profit urban foresters) across the United States to explore the practicalities of using specific tree species for improving heat-related health, and to inform future UF research and interventions. The primary findings were: 1) there are knowledge gaps on tree cooling potentials despite perceived importance of cooling; 2) despite evidence of climate warming, tree survival rather than cooling potential remains a priority; 3) climate change is altering habitat suitability and environmental stress tolerance, and therefore tree cooling potential; 4) funding can be better invested in tree maintenance than in new plantings; and 5) quantification of public health benefits of the UF may help increase advocacy for UF funding and public education. Our findings reveal that operationalizing tree cooling at the species-level is fundamentally challenging, particularly because climate warming increases the need for understanding species-specific cooling, yet there is uncertainty about which trees will survive in future climates. These challenges require continued multidisciplinary collaboration, particularly for researchers who are working at the intersection of public health, urban forestry, and climate change adaptation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.