Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321424›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry global open science2026

Electrophysiology and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cue Craving: Potential Biomarkers for Therapeutic Neuromodulation in Addiction.

Jody Tanabe, Jordan Hickman, Andy Tekriwal, Joseph Sakai, Aviva Abosch, Steven Ojemann, Joseph P Schacht, John A Thompson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cue-elicited prefrontal gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) dynamics in cannabis use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jody TanabeDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Jordan HickmanDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Andy TekriwalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Joseph SakaiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Aviva AboschDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Steven OjemannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Joseph P SchachtDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
John A ThompsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is the reduction of drug craving, which contributes to continued drug use and relapse. Pathological craving is thought to reflect dysfunction in neural networks, sparking a growing interest in modulating the mesocorticolimbic reward and related networks to decrease craving and improve outcomes. Although initial studies of neuromodulation in SUDs have produced promising results, biomarkers for craving remain elusive. Advances in deep brain stimulation (DBS) now allow recording of local field potentials (LFPs) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), the central hub of the reward circuit, thus paving the way for a novel LFP biomarker for craving. Insights into mechanistic models of craving that relate localized electrophysiology to distributed circuit activity are in the earliest stages. At the same time, performing invasive DBS surgery on individuals with SUD is a formidable challenge and underscores the need to refine our understanding of noninvasive functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-defined network biomarkers of craving. Here, we review the literature on LFPs and single-unit neural activity during craving and reward, highlighting recent findings of craving-related NAc LFPs in humans. Next, we review fMRI studies of cue craving in the context of potential neuromodulation targets based on a triple network model. Third, we briefly review relationships between electrophysiology and fMRI in general. Lastly, we suggest future research directions that integrate neuromodulation, electrophysiological recording, and neuroimaging to improve our understanding of craving in SUD.

Indexed as

AddictionCravingFunctional MRILocal field potentiationNeuromodulationSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID41321424
PMCPMC12663005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.