ReviewBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Investigating Links Between Prenatal Cannabis Exposure and Brain Development Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques: A Narrative Review.
Review in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the impact of prenatal cannabis exposure (PCE) on brain development is increasingly important given rising cannabis use during pregnancy. Many existing reviews on this topic are more than 5 years old and may not reflect recent social shifts that could impact cannabis use during pregnancy; they also have not utilized the recently available large longitudinal datasets for more robust and population-representative investigations. In this narrative review, we aim to provide an updated and expanded examination of the associations between PCE and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based brain outcomes from in utero development to adolescence. We included studies published after 2019 that used at least one of the following measures: structural MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, resting-state fMRI, and/or task-based fMRI. Across 9 studies that met criteria, 1 study focused on MRI outcomes in utero, 2 in infancy, and 6 in early adolescence, and only 3 studies included MRI and behavior outcomes. PCE was linked to differences in frontal, parietal, and temporal areas, spanning from in utero to adolescence across multiple MRI modalities. However, in the current state of the literature, detecting a consistent trend on PCE's impact on MRI findings was not possible. Furthermore, we found several divergences in study design: varying approaches to assessment (e.g., self-report vs. urine toxicology); difficulties in accounting for prenatal exposure to multiple substances; limited information on timing, frequency, potency, or mode of consumption; and the influence of parental or postnatal factors. Future research should implement designs that can rigorously capture the abovementioned elements to permit replication and eventual meta-analyses on this critical topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.