ReviewADMET & DMPK2025
Nano-biomaterials in cancer therapy: Advances in targeting and overcoming cancer stem cell resistance.
Review in ADMET & DMPK, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Cancer remains a leading cause of death globally, with long-term treatment success hindered by metastasis, recurrence, and therapy resistance. A central driver of these limitations is cancer stem cells (CSCs) - a rare subpopulation of tumour cells endowed with self-renewal and differentiation potential. CSCs contribute critically to tumour progression, metastatic spread, and resistance to conventional therapies, yet no clinically validated strategies currently exist to accurately detect or selectively eliminate them. Review approach: The paper systematically examined the literature on CSC origin, phenotypic characterization, isolation techniques, and mechanisms underlying resistance, including dormancy, enhanced DNA repair, apoptosis evasion, and microenvironmental protection. Particular attention was given to recent advances in nanomaterial-based strategies - metallic, carbon, and organic nanocarriers, designed to improve CSC-specific drug delivery, reactive oxygen species generation, pathway inhibition, and modulation of the CSC niche. Key results: Current CSC markers and in vivo models remain ambiguous and poorly standardized, limiting translational progress. Nanotechnology provides promising solutions by enabling targeted delivery and multi-functional therapy integration, yet most systems are still at the preclinical stage, constrained by issues of biocompatibility, targeting precision, and manufacturing scalability. Conclusion: Multifunctional nanoplatforms hold substantial potential to overcome CSC-driven resistance, improve therapeutic selectivity, and reduce recurrence. However, rigorous optimization and clinical validation are essential before these technologies can be integrated into routine oncology. This review advances understanding by outlining the intersection of CSC biology and nanomedicine, emphasizing translational pathways for CSC-targeted cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.