Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321377›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2025

Analysis of factors affecting companions' level of adherence to support roles during labor and childbirth: a mixed-methods study.

Gedamu Abera Zegeye, Muluemebet Abera Wordofa, Afework Mulugeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gedamu Abera ZegeyeDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6873-501X
Muluemebet Abera WordofaPopulation and Family Health Department, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Afework MulugetaSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Labor companions often lack clarity about their support roles during childbirth. Therefore, this study aims to analyze factors influencing companions' adherence to support roles during labor and childbirth. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to examine factors influencing companions' adherence to support roles from May to June 2024. Systematic random sampling selected 320 participants from the maternity ward. Data were collected via face-to-face exit interviews. Purposive sampling chose 24 labor companions for in-depth interviews. Adherence to support roles was measured using a four-point Likert scale, ranging from "not at all" to "all of the time." Ethical approval was obtained from the IRB at Jimma University, and support letters were secured for each study facility. Written consent was obtained from all participants. Results: Companions' adherence to support roles during childbirth had an overall mean score of 1.39 (95% CI: 1.29-1.49) on the four-point Likert scale. Specifically, 27.5% of companions reported not at all, and 35.63% reported only a little support, while 17.19% reported providing support all of the time. Awareness among companions was associated with increased adherence to support roles ( Conclusion: A structured orientation session for companions is a vital recommendation to address hindering factors to their support roles. Such a session might equip them with techniques how to provide.

Indexed as

EthiopiaLabor companionslevel of adherence to support roles

Identifiers

PMID41321377
PMCPMC12657770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.