Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321365›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Smoking cessation after referral from hospital to community stop smoking services: an observational study.

Rowan Cherodian, Matthew Franklin, Susan Baxter, James Chilcott, Duncan Gillespie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rowan CherodianSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8951-7932
Matthew FranklinSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2774-9439
Susan BaxterSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
James ChilcottSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1231-7817
Duncan GillespieSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-5747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In England, acute National Health Service (NHS) hospitals routinely ask patients about smoking status on admission, offering in-hospital treatment for tobacco dependence and support for quitting postdischarge. Referring patients to community stop smoking services (CSSS), which offer behavioural and pharmacological support postdischarge, is a key strategy for this continued support. This study investigated the patient flows from hospital to CSSS and the subsequent quitting outcomes. Methods: This study was part of an evaluation of a hospital tobacco dependence treatment service in South Yorkshire, England. The primary data source was electronic record data from one CSSS that received hospital referrals. Data were from July 2021 to March 2023, covering the initial phase of hospital service implementation. We described patient flows from hospital referral through to the 4-week self-reported quitting outcomes recorded by the CSSS. Generalised linear models explored associations between 4-week abstinence and patient characteristics including demographics, socioeconomic status, nicotine dependence and health factors. Results: Of 3223 hospital referrals, 72.0% (2322) could be contacted by the CSSS, 52.5% (1692) then registered, 41.4% (1333) made a CSSS-supported quit attempt and 25.3% (815) self-reported abstinence from smoking 4 weeks later. The analysis highlighted lower quitting success for people receiving free NHS prescriptions-an indicator of health and/or socioeconomic vulnerability (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.90) and with high nicotine dependence (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.87). Higher quitting success was found for people who reported having cancer (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.32), but otherwise, there were no significant influences of the health factors investigated. Conclusions: The substantial drop-out between hospital referral to CSSS and receiving their support for quit attempts is a key area for hospital and CSSS service improvement. The strong quitting success among people with cancer underscores the potential benefits of improved care transfer for vulnerable patient groups.

Indexed as

Community HealthPublic Healthstatistics and numerical data

Identifiers

PMID41321365
PMCPMC12658498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.