ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2026
TRITHORAX and HSP68 Regulate Clock Gene Transcription in the Drosophila Transcriptional Feedback Loop.
Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The circadian clock in eukaryotes keeps time via transcriptional feedback loops. In the transcriptional feedback loop of animals, CLOCK activator complexes drive expression of PER repressor complex components which feedback to inhibit CLOCK activation until PER complexes are degraded, thus initiating the next round of CLOCK activation ~24 h later. Recently, we showed that a region of monarch CLOCK (CLK) analogous to that encoded by mammalian CLOCK exon 19 (CLKe19r) and the methyltransferase TRITHORAX (TRX) are required for CLK activation, PER-CLK binding, and PER repression and that TRX-dependent methylation of Heat Shock Protein 68 (HSP68) at arginine 45 (R45) is necessary for PER-CLK binding and PER repression. Given that CLK activation and PER repression complexes in Drosophila are comprised of different core components than in monarchs, we tested whether similar mechanisms are used for CLK activation and PER repression in Drosophila. We found that the CLKe19r, TRX and HSP68 are all required for CLK activation yet only HSP68, but not HSP68 R45 methylation, is required for PER repression in Drosophila. These results reveal a well-conserved CLK activation mechanism and a PER repression mechanism that retains HSP68 function but does not require TRX-dependent methylation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.