Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321117›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2026

An Analysis of Cytomegalovirus-Specific Cell-Mediated Immunity in a Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Letermovir Prophylaxis in Cytomegalovirus-Seropositive Recipients of an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Genovefa A Papanicolaou, Sanjeet S Dadwal, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Patrizia Chiusolo, Michele I Morris, Eleni Tholouli, Barbara Haber, Natalya Broyde, Christopher L Gilbert, Cyrus Badshah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Genovefa A PapanicolaouDivision of Infectious Diseases, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2891-079X
Sanjeet S DadwalDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1099-0568
Ella J Ariza-HerediaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4543-6177
Patrizia ChiusoloHematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1355-1587
Michele I MorrisDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4479-8726
Eleni TholouliDepartment of Haematology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4940-639X
Barbara HaberMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-5470
Natalya BroydeMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1512-2838
Christopher L GilbertMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-7785-3229
Cyrus BadshahMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) prevents CMV reactivation after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Trends in CMV-CMI using the QuantiFERON-CMV assay and its clinical utility in a Phase 3 study were evaluated.

methodsCytomegalovirus-seropositive allogeneic HCT recipients who received letermovir prophylaxis through ∼100 days post-HCT were randomized to receive letermovir or placebo through ∼200 days post-HCT. QuantiFERON-CMV was performed at 100 days, 200 days, and Week 48 post-HCT. QuantiFERON-CMV results after prophylaxis completion (∼100 and ∼200 days post-HCT in placebo and letermovir groups, respectively) were evaluated for predicting postprophylaxis clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) through Week 48 post-HCT.

resultsQuantiFERON-CMV assay positivity was similar at study entry between letermovir (n = 82) and placebo (n = 47) groups (30.5% vs 31.9%), higher for placebo group at 200 days post-HCT (48.8% vs 74.5%), and comparable between groups at Week 48 post-HCT (65.9% vs 74.5%). Postprophylaxis CS-CMVi occurred by Week 48 in 10.5% (6/57) of participants with a positive result versus 19.0% (8/42) with a negative result at 200 days post-HCT in the letermovir group and 10.3% (3/29) of participants with a positive result versus 20.7% (6/29) with a negative result at 100 days post-HCT in the placebo group. Assay sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 60.0%, 57.1%, 89.5%, and 19.0% for tests at 200 days post-HCT (letermovir) and 53.1%, 66.7%, 89.7%, and 20.7% for tests at 100 days post-HCT (placebo).

conclusionsPositive QuantiFERON-CMV results increased after letermovir prophylaxis completion. Predictive utility of the QuantiFERON-CMV assay may be limited in the HCT setting.

Indexed as

cytomegalovirus-specific cell-mediated immunityhematopoietic cell transplantinterferon γ release assaysletermovirQuantiFERON-CMV assay

Identifiers

PMID41321117
PMCPMC13016986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.