ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
Thyroid Nodule Experts Evaluating ChatGPT's Assessment of Thyroid Nodules Classified by the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.
Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Models Versus Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Decisions in Thyroid Cancer.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Current Evidence, Selective Indications, and the Role of Lymph-Node Assessment in Intraoperative Frozen Section in Thyroid Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical and ultrasound-based optimization of post-FNA management decisions in Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ImportanceChatGPT has emerged as a medical resource through advanced language processing. Patients with thyroid nodules classified under The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) may use it to complement discussions with physicians.ObjectiveWe aimed to determine whether ChatGPT's recommendations on managing thyroid nodules classified by TBSRTC align with those of experienced thyroid specialists.Setting/ParticipantsA multidisciplinary panel of 5 thyroid cancer specialists, including otolaryngologists and endocrinologists, from 3 university-affiliated teaching hospitals in Montreal, Canada, evaluated the responses.Intervention/ExposureChatGPT-3.5 was prompted with 4 questions for each of the 6 Bethesda categories regarding the meaning and management of thyroid nodules, generating 24 responses for evaluation.Main Outcome/MeasuresWe assessed ChatGPT's accuracy against the latest American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines using a 4-point Likert scale (<50%, 50-74%, 75-89%, >90%). Additionally, specialists rated their comfort or reluctance in recommending ChatGPT as a complementary tool for patient discussions.ResultsOf the 24 ChatGPT-generated responses, 19 (79.2%) demonstrated moderate to good consistency with the ATA guidelines. The mean consistency score was 3.38/4 and median was 3.5. Consensus (IQR ≤ 1) was achieved in 23 out of 24 responses (95.8%), reflecting strong inter-rater reliability. Consistency scores were highest in Bethesda I-III and declined progressively in higher-risk categories, with the lowest mean score observed in Bethesda VI. Similarly, an upward trend in clinician reluctance was observed from Bethesda I through VI, indicating greater caution in recommending ChatGPT responses for patients suspicious for or diagnosed with malignancy (Bethesda V-VI).Conclusion and RelevanceWhile ChatGPT's responses generally align with specialist recommendations, they are not fully reliable. ChatGPT lacks the ability to serve as an independent or accurate source of medical advice for thyroid nodule management. It remains a useful complement for patient discussions, especially in low-risk scenarios, but further improvements are necessary to make it a safe, reliable component of patient care in complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.