Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321102›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Editorial: COVID-19 Six Years on and Endemic Omicron Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Under Monitoring Now Include NB.1.8.1 (Nimbus) and XFG (Stratus).

Dinah V Parums

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Editorial: Emergence of Cicada (BA.3.2) SARS-CoV-2 and the Implications for COVID-19 Surveillance and Monitoring.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dinah V ParumsScience Editor, Medical Science Monitor, International Scientific Information, Inc., Melville, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0145-5464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Six years ago, in December 2019, patients in Hubei Province, China, reported symptoms of atypical pneumonia that were unresponsive to treatment, and in Wuhan, an outbreak of similar cases was reported to the World Health Organization (WHO). On January 30, 2020, the WHO declared that COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, was a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC). By November 2, 2025, the total number of COVID-19 cases reported to the WHO since 2020 was 778,900,250. On June 25, 2025, the WHO Technical Advisory Group on Virus Evolution (TAG-VE) reported a risk evaluation for two SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants under monitoring (VUM), NB.1.8.1 (Nimbus) and XFG (Stratus). At the end of 2025, genomic analysis of the infecting SARS‑CoV‑2 virus identified them as the most common circulating viruses causing COVID-19. This editorial aims to highlight that, six years on from the initial reports of SARS-CoV-2 cases that led to the COVID-19 pandemic, complacency in infection control and surveillance has resulted in a concerning increase in infection from endemic Omicron variants, including NB.1.8.1 (Nimbus) and XFG (Stratus).

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2ChinaHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID41321102
PMCPMC12739884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.