Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321050›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of family medicine2026

Exploring the determinants of family planning practices among women with diabetes and no pregnancy intention in Malaysia: women's voices.

Irmi Zarina Ismail, Chirk Jenn Ng, Ping Yein Lee, Norita Hussein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irmi Zarina IsmailDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Chirk Jenn NgDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ping Yein LeeDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Norita HusseinDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

Postgraduate Research Fund PG282-2016A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContraception is essential for women with diabetes to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the contraception rate among this high-risk group remains low. This study explored the determinants of contraceptive practices among multi-ethnic Asian women with diabetes.

methodsThis exploratory qualitative study on the preconception care of multi-ethnic, reproductive-age women with diabetes was conducted at four public health clinics in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted, audio-recorded, and transcribed. An interpretive thematic analysis was performed on data regarding contraception among 19 women who expressed no desire for pregnancy.

resultsHealth concerns, perceived susceptibility to pregnancy, lack of knowledge regarding contraception and conception, and prevailing pregnancy norms influenced contraceptive practices. Many factors affecting pregnancy planning were unrelated to diabetes, such as perceived pregnancy susceptibility, religious orientation, societal norms, husband's preferences, and inadequate contraception knowledge.

conclusionFamily planning and reproductive health must be included in routine clinical consultations for women with diabetes. While this study re-emphasizes the influence of diabetes on women's decisions to use contraception, their choices are also shaped by personal and social factors. Healthcare providers must adopt a more open approach toward women's perspectives on pregnancy planning and further explore their values and underlying issues to promote effective contraception, considering the benefits.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorDiabetes MellitusDoctor Patient RelationReligion

Identifiers

PMID41321050
PMCPMC13033426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.