ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Late-Onset Mesh Infection 10 Years After Right Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late-onset mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair is uncommon, and onset occurring years later is rare. Risk factors include field or implant contamination, host factors, such as diabetes and chronic steroids, and secondary fistulae with adjacent organs. CASE REPORT An 86-year-old man underwent right inguinal hernia repair with the Prolene Hernia System about 10 years earlier. He presented with right lower quadrant pain. Computed tomography (CT) showed an abscess tracking from the appendiceal tip to the right lower abdominal wall, suggesting mesh infection. Symptoms improved with conservative treatment, but purulent drainage from the right groin appeared after hospital discharge. Repeat CT identified a cecal mass; colonoscopy confirmed an appendiceal orifice tumor, pathologically an adenoma. Obstruction at the appendiceal orifice produced a fistula between the appendix and the abdominal wall, leading to delayed mesh infection. Planned laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed. Intraoperatively, the appendiceal tip was densely adherent to the abdominal wall, and a portion of mesh was exposed intraperitoneally; no pus was encountered. Expecting control without explantation, we performed ileocecal resection with the mesh left in situ. Persistent groin drainage necessitated staged mesh removal: most of the implant was excised first, then a second operation removed the remainder with open drainage. Negative-pressure wound therapy achieved complete healing without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the management difficulty of mesh infection caused by an appendiceal fistula long after hernia repair. Failure to remove all mesh markedly increases the risk of recurrence and prolongs treatment; in this patient, incomplete initial removal likely lengthened the clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.