ArticleJournal of clinical apheresis2025
Real-World Safety Data From the World Apheresis Association Registry for the Spectra Optia Apheresis System.
Article in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction to "Real-World Safety Data From the World Apheresis Association Registry for the Spectra Optia Apheresis System".Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Article
- Real-World Safety Data From the World Apheresis Association Registry for the Spectra Optia Apheresis System.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study we analyzed 12 years of adverse events, (AE) data from the World Apheresis Association, (WAA) Registry specific to the Spectra Optia Apheresis System. We queried WAA Registry data, (2012-2023) on apheresis procedures performed exclusively on the Spectra Optia Apheresis System. We categorized AEs by severity, (mild, moderate, and severe), and ordered them by year. We then analyzed and presented AEs associated with the following variables: diagnosis, procedure type, vascular access, and replacement fluid type, and causes of procedural interruption. We identified 51 567 apheresis procedures specific to the Spectra Optia Apheresis System within the data set. AE rates from 2012 to 2023 for mild, moderate, and severe were 1.43%, 2.81%, and 0.21%, respectively. Procedures associated with the lowest AE rates include red blood cell exchange and therapeutic plasma exchange. The most common mild and moderate AEs include tingling and hypotension and AEs related to vascular access. The highest rates of mild and moderate AEs were associated with cellular collections. The highest rate of severe AEs was associated with the use of 3.5% albumin as replacement fluid. Other variables impacting patient safety are identified. AE rates could not be compared to the median length of procedure since this time variable is not currently collected in the Registry. This is the first device-specific analysis of the WAA Registry data, bringing prior safety reporting into even sharper focus. Device-specific safety analysis like this will help practitioners better understand potential safety concerns associated with a commonly used apheresis device, including various separation modalities and accessories, thus supporting improved procedure management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.