ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
RETRACTION: α-Synuclein Conformational Antibodies Fused to Penetratin are Effective in Models of Lewy Body Disease.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionB. Spencer, S. Williams, E. Rockenstein, E. Valera, W. Xin, M. Mante, J. Florio, A. Adame, E. Masliah, and M.R. Sierks, "α-Synuclein Conformational Antibodies Fused to Penetratin are Effective in Models of Lewy Body Disease," Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology 3, no. 8 (2016): 588-606, https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.321. The above article, published online on 16 June 2016, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Ahmet Hoke; the American Neurological Association; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. Following publication, a third party contacted the publisher with concerns about duplications in Figures 1A, 3A, 3C, and 4A. Additionally, duplicated panels were discovered for Figure 5 with an earlier publication by some of the same authors (Fields et al., 2016 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-016-0585-8]). The retraction has been agreed to because of evidence that significant portions of multiple figures were duplicated, affecting the interpretation of the data and results presented. Author Eliezer Masliah did not indicate his agreement with the retraction. The other authors did not respond to communications from the Publisher regarding the retraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.