Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41320900›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025

Cerebellar and Brainstem White Matter Geometric Alterations in Multiple System Atrophy: A DFA-Based Biomarker for Disease Staging.

Hua Zhu, Shuxiang Zhu, Meixin Zhao, Ziyan Zhu, Yuxuan Shao, Xinxi Lu, Tao Liu, Haogang Zhu, Ni Shu, Hua Lin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anti-Sez6L2 antibody-associated autoimmune cerebellar ataxia: a rare case with implications of rituximab therapy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hua ZhuBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6719-1044
Shuxiang ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Meixin ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ziyan ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuxuan ShaoDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xinxi LuSchool of Software, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Tao LiuBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Haogang ZhuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Ni ShuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University Beijing, Beijing, China.
Hua LinDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2031-8799
Jian ChengSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 4252004Beijing Natural Science Foundation L242038Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research CFH2022-2-2014Chinese Institutes for Medical Research Beijing CX25YQ11Key Clinical Project of Peking University Third Hospital BYSYZD2023016National Key Research and Development Program Intergovernmental Key Project of China 2024YFE0100900National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2402205National Natural Science Foundation of China 82471498the Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence, Zhejiang University BMI2400001the STI2030-Major Projects 2022ZD0213300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo characterize white matter geometric pathology in cerebellar subtype of multiple system atrophy (MSA-C) using director field analysis (DFA) and identify stage-specific biomarkers.

methodsWe analyzed single-shell diffusion MRI (b = 1000) in 31 MSA-C patients (15 early-, 16 late-stage) and 33 controls. DFA quantified axonal geometry (splay/bend/twist), complemented by fixel-based analysis (FBA) and brainstem volumetry. Group comparisons used threshold free cluster enhancement (TFCE) (p < 0.05 FWE-corrected). DFA-altered regions were correlated with clinical scores. AutoGluon evaluated classification performance using different feature sets.

resultsMSA-C exhibited distinct geometric degeneration patterns: cerebellar pathways showed reduced splay, bend, and twist (reflecting Wallerian degeneration), whereas brainstem tracts demonstrated dissociated geometry (increased splay/bend but decreased twist). Brainstem twist reduction strongly differentiated early- and late-stage MSA-C (AUC = 0.95). Clinically, middle cerebellar peduncle bend correlated with motor progression (UMSARS-II: r = 0.48), while cerebellar splay reduction predicted ataxia severity (SARA: r = -0.43).

conclusionDFA captures circuit-specific white matter pathology in MSA-C, with brainstem twist emerging as a novel biomarker associated with disease stage. The integration of geometric metrics with automated machine learning provides a robust framework for early diagnosis and disease staging, highlighting distinct neurodegenerative mechanisms in cerebellar versus brainstem pathways.

Indexed as

Brain StemCerebellumMultiple System AtrophyWhite MatterAgedBiomarkersDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersbiomarkerbrainstemdirector field analysisgeometricsmultiple system atrophywhite matter

Identifiers

PMID41320900
PMCPMC12665615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.