Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41320737›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Sounds easy, looks nice: Crossmodal transfer of auditory processing fluency to visual object preference.

Sarah Knight, Jonathan C Flavell, Sven Mattys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah KnightSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK. sarah.knight@newcastle.ac.uk.
Jonathan C FlavellDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Sven MattysDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RPG-2018-152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluent (i.e., rapid and efficient) processing of perceptual objects is vital for humans to successfully navigate their environments. The experience of fluent processing per se tends to trigger positive affect; however, this affect is often misattributed by perceivers to the objects themselves, meaning that easy-to-perceive objects are judged more positively. These fluency-based preference effects have been robustly demonstrated unimodally, and specifically in situations in which fluency and preference are manipulated and measured for the same objects. However, little is known about how this effect operates crossmodally, when manipulations of fluency in one domain are combined with preference judgements for unmanipulated objects in another domain. In six experiments, we manipulated perceptual fluency in a simple auditory task which participants performed whilst viewing visual objects, which they rated for liking. We found that visual objects presented with easier (more fluent) auditory stimuli received higher liking ratings. This effect persisted when a temporal lag was introduced between the auditory/visual components, but was less reliable for static (as opposed to moving) objects. These results show that fluency-based preference effects can operate crossmodally. They have implications for a range of real-world contexts involving preference and attitude change.

Indexed as

AffectAttentionAuditory PerceptionChoice BehaviorPattern Recognition, VisualTransfer, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMotion PerceptionReaction TimeYoung AdultAudiovisualCrossmodalPerceptual fluencyPreference

Identifiers

PMID41320737
PMCPMC12665627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.