Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41320625›Full record

ReviewJournal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS2026

Harnessing population genetics and animal models to uncover the genetics of skin scarring.

Oscar A Peña, Marisa Cañadas-Garre, Iona Collins, Nicholas J Timpson, Paul Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oscar A PeñaSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. Electronic address: oscar.pena@bristol.ac.uk.
Marisa Cañadas-GarreBristol Medical School, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK; Population Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK.
Iona CollinsBristol Medical School, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK; Population Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK.
Nicholas J TimpsonBristol Medical School, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK; Population Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK.
Paul MartinSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 217169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin wound healing is a complex process that requires the orchestrated response of several different cell types to repair the damaged tissue and restore function. Superficial skin wounds tend to heal within days. However, larger and deeper wounds such as those caused by trauma or surgery generally heal by leaving a scar, which can impact tissue function. Scars can be debilitating, painful, and can significantly impair function. New developments to prevent and treat scarring require a deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with wound healing and scarring. Most of our current understanding of the genetics of wound healing comes from studies in animal models. However, population health approaches combined with experimental validation in animal models offer new opportunities to harness natural variability in wound repair outcomes in the population and identify new relevant biology controlling different aspects of repair and scarring in a different way. These approaches have the potential to reveal association between genetic loci and wound phenotypes in humans. Complementary experimental studies in animal models can help to validate these candidate genes and our understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In this non-systematic review, we propose the application of strategies using population health/genetics together with zebrafish models of wounding to specifically study skin scarring. We discuss potential pitfalls and strengths of the combined and complementary use of population health approaches and animal models for the identification and validation of new genes involved in skin repair, and in particular, scarring.

Indexed as

CicatrixGenetics, PopulationSkinWound HealingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansZebrafishGWASScarringSkinWound healingZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID41320625
PMCPMC7618695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.