ReviewJournal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS2026
Harnessing population genetics and animal models to uncover the genetics of skin scarring.
Review in Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systemic Comorbidities of Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars: A Phenome-Wide Association Study in a Multiethnic U.S. Pediatric Cohort.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin wound healing is a complex process that requires the orchestrated response of several different cell types to repair the damaged tissue and restore function. Superficial skin wounds tend to heal within days. However, larger and deeper wounds such as those caused by trauma or surgery generally heal by leaving a scar, which can impact tissue function. Scars can be debilitating, painful, and can significantly impair function. New developments to prevent and treat scarring require a deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with wound healing and scarring. Most of our current understanding of the genetics of wound healing comes from studies in animal models. However, population health approaches combined with experimental validation in animal models offer new opportunities to harness natural variability in wound repair outcomes in the population and identify new relevant biology controlling different aspects of repair and scarring in a different way. These approaches have the potential to reveal association between genetic loci and wound phenotypes in humans. Complementary experimental studies in animal models can help to validate these candidate genes and our understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In this non-systematic review, we propose the application of strategies using population health/genetics together with zebrafish models of wounding to specifically study skin scarring. We discuss potential pitfalls and strengths of the combined and complementary use of population health approaches and animal models for the identification and validation of new genes involved in skin repair, and in particular, scarring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.