ArticleChinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi2026
Prognostic value of CT scoring systems and a simplified prediction model for pediatric moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the prognostic performance of 4 CT scoring systems in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and develop a simplified, interpretable predictive model based on machine learning.
methodsThis retrospective study included 103 pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe TBI who were admitted to a tertiary children's hospital in Southwest China from September 2020 to December 2023. CT images were assessed using the Marshall score, Rotterdam score, Helsinki score, and Stockholm score. Clinical outcomes were defined by the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) and categorized as favorable results (GOS 4-5) or unfavorable results (GOS 1-3). The dataset was divided into a training set (n=83) and a test set (n=20). Class imbalance was corrected using the random over-sampling examples method. Eight classification models were compared through 5-fold cross-validation. The Naive Bayes model showed the best performance and was simplified to include 5 key predictors. An interactive online application was developed to provide individualized prognostic estimation and visualization.
resultsThe Helsinki score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy among the 4 CT scores (area under the curve (AUC)=0.906), followed by the Stockholm score (AUC=0.897), Rotterdam score (AUC=0.837), and Marshall score (AUC=0.764). The simplified Naive Bayes model achieved an AUC of 0.930, with 100% sensitivity and 65.9% specificity in the test set. The model enables real-time outcome prediction and visual interpretation of contributing factors.
conclusionsThe simplified Naive Bayes model outperforms traditional CT scoring systems in predicting outcomes of pediatric moderate-to-severe TBI. Its easy use, interpretability, and web-based implementation support its potential for clinical application. Further prospective and multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.