ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH2025
Advances and future perspectives in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies for multiple myeloma.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Highlights: Immunotherapy for B-cell lymphoma.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of T-cell-redirecting therapies has considerably reshaped the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), particularly in patients with triple-class exposed or refractory disease. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), which primarily target B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), have shown remarkable efficacy in pivotal trials and real-world settings. More recently, G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D-targeted agents have emerged as promising options, particularly for patients who relapse after undergoing BCMA-directed therapy. CAR T-cell therapies can induce deep and durable responses with the potential for long-term remission. However, their use is limited because of manufacturing delays, center certification requirements, and severe toxicity risks. BsAbs offer the advantage of being off-the-shelf, enabling immediate treatment initiation and generally manageable safety profiles, making them the preferred option for frail patients or those with rapidly progressing disease. Nevertheless, continuous dosing and cumulative immunosuppression remain a clinical challenge. Although no direct comparative trials exist between CAR T-cell therapies and BsAbs, each modality has distinct advantages and limitations. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on disease characteristics, patient conditions, and institutional capabilities. Future directions include integrating these agents into earlier lines of therapy, developing novel targets, and exploring multi-antigen strategies to overcome antigen escape. As this field rapidly evolves, real-world evidence and personalized treatment approaches will become critical for optimizing outcomes in patients with RRMM. This review provides an up-to-date summary of the current T-cell-redirecting therapies, including their clinical profiles and safety considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.