ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
The science of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL): perspectives from the SITC Surgery Committee.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- HosTIL territory: mapping the landscape of toxicity in TIL therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- The trinity of T cell engagement: navigating the molecular and clinical landscape of CAR-T, TILs, and TCEs in the war against cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Second signals for cancer immunotherapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunity to solid tumors is associated with the hallmarks of cancer-associated inflammation and the ability of immune mechanisms to limit tumor progression. Application of expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte adoptive T cell therapy (TIL ACT) in clinical trials is now practiced at many sites around the world. Prior to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), an approximate 50% objective response rate was consistently observed across multiple institutions for patients with melanoma. This now-approved strategy approaches 35% in recent studies from the USA and 49% with more highly selected patients in Europe. Here, we focus on early TIL studies in non-melanoma epithelial neoplasms. Increased understanding of cancer immunology has allowed changes in the TIL expansion process to include: (1) initial generation of TIL from fragments, (2) use of specialized large-scale culture vessels, (3) use of the rapid expansion protocol to enable 'young' TIL prosecution, and (4) treatment regimens employing non-myeloablative (NMA) chemotherapy followed by brief interleukin-2 administration. NMA leads to homeostatic proliferation of the transferred T cells, engraftment, profound neutropenia and lymphopenia, and improved clinical outcome. A key success of TIL ACT relies on the quality, specificity, and number of pre-existing TIL. This, in turn, is highly influenced by the suppressive tumor microenvironment. Thus, any means to alter 'cold tumor (non-T cell inflamed)' to 'hot tumor (T cell inflamed)' is theoretically desirable to improve both the quality and quantity of TIL obtained before harvest. Combinations of other immunotherapies such as application of ICB, co-stimulatory molecule agonist antibodies, autophagy inhibition, and dendritic cell support strategies could provide additional- improvements in TIL therapy and enable harnessing of the adaptive immune response to enhance the clinical outcome of TIL-ACT patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.