Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41320227›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

Neoadjuvant personalized viral vaccine prevents tumor relapse in checkpoint-resistant murine melanoma model.

Laura Seclì, Linda Nocchi, Guido Leoni, Gabriella Cotugno, Fulvia Troise, Giuseppina Romano, Teresa Busiello, Elisa Micarelli, Irene Garzia, Laura Antonucci and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura SeclìNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-3355
Linda NocchiNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-9031
Guido LeoniNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Gabriella CotugnoNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Fulvia TroiseNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-1495
Giuseppina RomanoNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Teresa BusielloNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6258-1568
Elisa MicarelliNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Irene GarziaNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Laura AntonucciNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Elisa ScarselliNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-6713
Anna Morena D'AliseNousCom Srl, Rome, Lazio, Italy m.dalise@nouscom.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-6269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized cancer vaccines targeting tumor-specific neoantigens (nAgs) are an emerging therapeutic strategy, particularly effective in early-stage disease before immune suppression is established. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated benefit in the adjuvant setting (postsurgery), and recent evidence suggests neoadjuvant administration (before surgery) may further enhance antitumor immunity. This study evaluated the efficacy of a multiepitope nAg vaccine in a preclinical melanoma model resistant to checkpoint inhibition, comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, alone or in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) therapy.

methodsA viral vector nAg vaccine was developed and administered in the B16F10 murine melanoma model. Mice received the vaccine either before (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) tumor resection alone or in combination with anti-PD1. Tumor recurrence and survival were assessed. Immune profiling was performed to evaluate T cell phenotypes, and CD8

resultsNeoadjuvant vaccination alone provided approximately 70% protection against tumor recurrence. When combined with anti-PD1, protection increased to 90%. Notably, anti-PD1 alone conferred 60% protection when used in a neoadjuvant setting. In contrast, adjuvant vaccination was ineffective as monotherapy and required combination with anti-PD1 to prevent relapse. The efficacy of neoadjuvant vaccination was dependent on CD8

conclusionsNeoadjuvant nAg vaccination elicits potent CD8

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanoma, ExperimentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalViral VaccinesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeoadjuvant TherapyPrecision MedicineCancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsViral VaccinesImmunotherapyNeoadjuvantSurgeryVaccine

Identifiers

PMID41320227
PMCPMC12666103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.