Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41320212›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

How can we improve migrant health checks in UK primary care: 'Health Catch-UP!' a protocol for a participatory intervention development study.

Jessica Carter, Felicity Knights, Kathryn Mackey, Anna Deal, Eltayeb Hassan, Jose Trueba, Nimal Jayawardhena, Janet Alfred, Isra Al-Sharabi, Yusuf Ciftci and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jessica CarterThe Migrant Health Research Group, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, UK jcarter@sgul.ac.uk s.hargreaves@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-3146
Felicity KnightsThe Migrant Health Research Group, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, UK.
Kathryn MackeyThe Migrant Health Research Group, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, UK.
Anna DealThe Migrant Health Research Group, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, UK.
Eltayeb HassanMigrant Health Community Research Network, London, UK.
Jose TruebaMigrant Health Community Research Network, London, UK.
Nimal JayawardhenaMigrant Health Community Research Network, London, UK.
Janet AlfredMigrant Health Community Research Network, London, UK.
Isra Al-SharabiMigrant Health Community Research Network, London, UK.
Yusuf CiftciMigrant Health Community Research Network, London, UK.
Nathaniel AsprayThe Migrant Health Research Group, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, UK.
Philippa HarrisMigrant Health Community Research Network, London, UK.
Subash JayakumarNHS Northwest London Integrated Care System, The Stonebridge Practice, Harness PCN South, London, UK.
Farah SeedatThe Migrant Health Research Group, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3563-7875
Nuria Sanchez-ClementeThe Migrant Health Research Group, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, UK.
Rebecca HallGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Azeem MajeedPrimary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-9858
Tess HarrisPopulation Health Research Institute, City St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-1553
Ana Requena MéndezBarcelona Institute for Global Health (IS Global Campus Clinic), Barcelona, Spain.
Dominik ZennerWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Sarah Tonkin-CrineNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-1151
Sally HargreavesThe Migrant Health Research Group, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, UK jcarter@sgul.ac.uk s.hargreaves@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-4348

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobal migration has steadily risen, with 16% of the UK population born abroad. Migrants (defined here as foreign-born individuals) face unique health risks, including potential higher rates and delays in diagnosis of infectious and non-communicable diseases, compounded by significant barriers to healthcare. UK Public Health guidelines recommend screening at-risk migrants, but primary care often faces significant challenges in achieving this, exacerbating health disparities. The Health Catch-UP! tool was developed as a novel digital, multidisease screening and catch-up vaccination solution to support primary care to identify at-risk adult migrants and offer individualised care. The tool has been shown to be acceptable and feasible and to increase migrant health screening in previous studies, but to facilitate use in routine care requires the development of an implementation package. This protocol describes the development and optimisation of an implementation package for Health Catch-UP! following the person-based approach (PBA), a participatory intervention development methodology, and evaluates our use of this methodological approach for migrant participants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Through engagement with both migrants and primary healthcare professionals (approximately 80-100 participants) via participatory workshops, focus groups and think-aloud interviews, the study aims to cocreate a comprehensive Health Catch-UP! implementation package. This package will encompass healthcare professional support materials, patient resources and potential Health Catch-UP! care pathways (delivery models), developed through iterative refinement based on user feedback and behavioural theory. The study will involve three linked phases (1) planning: formation of an academic-community coalition and cocreation of guiding principles, logic model and intervention planning table, (2) intervention development: focus groups and participatory workshops to coproduce prototype implementation materials and (3) intervention optimisation: think-aloud interviews to iteratively refine the final implementation package. An embedded mixed-methods evaluation of how we used the PBA will allow shared learning from the use of this methodology within the migrant health context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval granted by the St George's University Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 2024.0191). A community celebration event will be held to recognise contributions and to demonstrate impact.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPrimary Health CareTransients and MigrantsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFocus GroupsHumansResearch DesignUnited KingdomCardiovascular DiseaseHealthINFECTIOUS DISEASESPreventive Health ServicesPrimary Health CareRefugees

Identifiers

PMID41320212
PMCPMC12666209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.