ArticleBMJ open2025
Measurement properties of assessment tools for affiliate stigma in parents of children with autism: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder. Parents of children with ASD often have a higher level of affiliate stigma, which impacts their physical and mental health, family relationships and social functions. Nowadays, a variety of assessment tools are available for measuring this stigma, but they have many limitations. This systematic review aims to critically appraise the measurement properties of instruments used to assess affiliate stigma in parents of children with autism and help researchers and healthcare professionals make more appropriate choices when using these tools. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. We will search five English databases (ie, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect Online, Embase and Cochrane Library) and four Chinese databases (ie, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and VIP information) from the databases' inception to 30 September 2025. Eligible studies will evaluate instruments measuring affiliate stigma in parents of children with autism, including self-report and observer ratings. The psychometric properties assessed will include reliability, validity, responsiveness, interpretability and clinical utility. Only primary quantitative studies published in peer-reviewed journals will be included. The search will have no limitations on language or time. Two researchers will independently carry out data extraction and quality assessment, with disagreements resolved through consensus or a third researcher. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments risk of bias checklist and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to evaluate each measure's methodological quality and overall strength of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this research constitutes a systematic review of pre-existing published data, formal ethics committee approval is deemed unnecessary in accordance with international research ethics guidelines. The synthesised findings will be submitted for publication in a rigorously peer-reviewed academic journal and presented at pertinent scientific conferences to ensure transparent knowledge dissemination within the academic community. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251043478.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.