Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41319967›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2025

Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction after resection of the distal radius : survival and functional results at ten to 24 years follow-up.

Guido Scoccianti, Serena Puccini, Eleonora Mellace, Martina Caterino, Maurizio Scorianz, Domenico A Campanacci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guido ScocciantiCareggi University Hospital, Orthopaedic Oncology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Serena PucciniCareggi University Hospital, Orthopaedic Oncology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Eleonora MellaceCareggi University Hospital, Orthopaedic Oncology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Martina CaterinoCareggi University Hospital, Orthopaedic Oncology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Maurizio ScorianzCareggi University Hospital, Orthopaedic Oncology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Domenico A CampanacciCareggi University Hospital, Orthopaedic Oncology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Various reconstructions of the distal radius after tumour resection have been proposed. Osteoarticular allografts can restore a functional joint, but the long-term durability of this reconstruction has been questioned. Data on long-term results are scarce in the literature. The aim of our study was to answer the following questions: What is the long-term survival of osteoarticular distal radius allografts with a minimum follow-up of ten years? What is the long-term patient satisfaction? Methods: From 1999 to 2013, we performed 23 reconstructions with osteoarticular allografts after distal radius resection. Patients had a mean age of 36 years (14 to 69); 17 had giant cell tumour, three Ewing's sarcoma, two osteosarcoma, and one osteoblastoma. All patients were evaluated for allograft survival and functional outcome (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score). Results: One patient was lost to follow-up at 53 months. One patient died for concomitant disease at 44 months. Of the remaining 21 patients, one underwent revision arthrodesis at 48 months. A total of 20 allografts remained in situ at follow-up for a mean of 213 months (22 to 293). The mean MSTS was 25.7 (18 to 30), and the mean DASH was 10.4 (0 to 30). According to the MSTS parameter of emotional acceptance, all patients with a surviving allograft scored still satisfied or higher. Conclusion: In our experience, osteoarticular allografts in distal radius reconstruction can be a long-lasting procedure with long-term patient satisfaction. Few and conflicting results are reported in the literature; even when comparing series, it is difficult to clearly identify factors that may explain the differences in reported results.

Identifiers

PMID41319967
PMCPMC12665384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.