Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41319865›Full record

ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal

Dofetilide in atrial fibrillation: A comprehensive review.

Diksha Mahendru, Harin D Joshi, Peter Kowey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diksha MahendruDivision of Internal Medicine, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA. Electronic address: dikshamahendru02@gmail.com.
Harin D JoshiLake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, NY, USA.
Peter KoweyLankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden worldwide. The management of AF remains complex, encompassing rate and rhythm control strategies, anticoagulation, and comorbidity optimization. Dofetilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, has emerged as an important therapeutic option for rhythm control due to its relatively selective blockade of the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr). Unlike many other antiarrhythmics, it lacks significant negative inotropy, making it safe for use in patients with structural heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction. However, its use is limited by concerns regarding torsades de pointes, mandatory in-hospital initiation, and stringent monitoring requirements. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of dofetilide, including its pharmacology, clinical trial evidence, safety profile, guideline recommendations, role in special populations, real-world application in India, and future perspectives.

Identifiers

PMID41319865
PMCPMC12790294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.