ArticleCancer biology & therapy2025
cGAS-STING signaling in the tumor microenvironment induces myeloid cell activation and favors T cell-mediated antitumor immunity.
Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- STING Drives CD4Experimental dermatology · 2026Article
- Review
- Emerging Nanoplatforms are Effective Against Tumor Hypoxia.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cancer-immunity cycle is regulated by a series of stimulatory and inhibitory factors. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway, a key stimulator of type I interferon production, connects innate and adaptive immunity to promote antitumor responses. Using a syngeneic pancreatic tumor model, we characterized the single-cell landscape changes induced by STING stimulation. Our findings revealed that STING agonist treatment reprograms transcription across multiple cell lineages, enhances innate immune responses and activates lymphocytes, thereby promoting antitumor effects. Single-cell transcriptome sequencing identified significant increases in monocytes, neutrophils, macrophages, and CD8 T cells, indicating augmented tumor inflammation. Differential gene expression analysis highlighted upregulated genes related to immune cell effector mechanisms and antigen presentation. Functional assays confirmed the enhanced tumor killing effects induced by STING activation. These results underscore the potential of STING agonists in reprogramming the tumor microenvironment to potentiate antitumor immunity, although clinical translation remains challenging owing to pharmacokinetic limitations and potential systemic toxicity. Further research is needed to optimize STING agonist delivery and dosage for effective cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.