Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41319223›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2025

Stratification-based instrumental variable analysis framework for nonlinear effect analysis.

Haodong Tian, Ashish Patel, Stephen Burgess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hypothesis test of specific parametric structure in a generalized additive model.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haodong TianCenter for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Ashish PatelMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.
Stephen BurgessMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5365-8760

Funding

Innovation Medical Research Council MC_UU_00040/01United Kingdom ResearchWellcome Trust 225790Wellcome Trust 225790/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonlinear causal effects are prevalent in many research scenarios involving continuous exposures, and instrumental variables (IVs) can be employed to investigate such effects, particularly in the presence of unmeasured confounders. However, common IV methods for nonlinear effect analysis, such as IV regression or the control-function method, have inherent limitations, leading to either low statistical power or potentially misleading conclusions. In this work, we propose an alternative IV framework for nonlinear effect analysis, which has recently emerged in genetic epidemiology and addresses many of the drawbacks of existing IV methods. The proposed IV framework consists of up to three key "S" elements: (i) the Stratification approach, which constructs multiple strata that are sub-samples of the population in which the IV core assumptions remain valid, (ii) the Scalar-on-function model and Scalar-on-scalar model, which connect local stratum-specific information to global effect estimation, and (iii) the Sum-of-single-effects method for effect estimation. This framework enables study of the effect function while avoiding unnecessary model assumptions. In particular, it facilitates the identification of change points or threshold values in causal effects. Through a wide variety of simulations, we demonstrate that our framework outperforms other representative nonlinear IV methods in predicting the effect shape when the instrument is weak and can accurately estimate the effect function as well as identify the change point and predict its value under various structural model and effect shape scenarios. We further apply our framework to assess the nonlinear effect of alcohol consumption on systolic blood pressure using a genetic instrument (ie Mendelian randomization) with UK Biobank data. Our analysis detects a threshold beyond which alcohol intake exhibits a clear causal effect on the outcome. Our results are consistent with published medical guidelines.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalNonlinear DynamicsBlood PressureCausalityComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumanscausal effect shapefunctional data analysisMendelian randomizationstratificationvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID41319223
PMCPMC12665183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.