Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41319029›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2026

Young People With and Without Intellectual Disability Accessing Mental Health Services: Evaluating Psychosocial Functioning Outcomes Using Electronic Health Records.

Z Sienna Pan, Carlo Schuengel, Barry Coughlan, Lianne Bakkum, Matt Woolgar, Sarah Carman, Robbie Duschinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Z Sienna PanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-449X
Carlo SchuengelDepartment of Educational and Family Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5501-3341
Barry CoughlanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lianne BakkumDepartment of Educational and Family Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2880-6853
Matt WoolgarInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3618-0395
Sarah CarmanSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Robbie DuschinskyDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East of England (NIHR ARC EoE) at Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation TrustNIHR Health and Social Care Delivery Research NIHR134922What Works for Early Intervention and Children's Social Care
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing recognition that many young people (<18 years) with intellectual disability (ID) may benefit from psychosocial support provided by mental health services, yet intervention outcomes have not been robustly evaluated.

methodData from 1986 episodes of care for young people with ID and 3968 matched episodes for those without ID were extracted from electronic health records of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2001-2023). Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS).

resultsID frequently co-occurred with other neurodevelopmental conditions and behavioural difficulties (prevalence > 50%). CGAS scores at service entry positively predicted CGAS scores at discharge; however, this association weakened in the presence of ID and co-occurring pervasive developmental disorders or hyperkinetic disorders. ID was associated with lower CGAS scores at discharge than those without ID. Within the ID group, young people with severe/profound ID and comorbidities demonstrated greater rates of improvement than those with severe/profound ID only. 20% of young people with ID showed clinically significant improvement at discharge (reliable change index ≥ 1.96). Despite this improvement, 80% of the same group continued to experience substantial impairment (CGAS < 61).

conclusionsMost young people with ID remained substantially impaired at discharge, highlighting the complexity of their needs and the importance of sustained, targeted support. Further research should examine specific intervention types and treatment trajectories in this population.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsIntellectual DisabilityMental Health ServicesNeurodevelopmental DisordersOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychosocial FunctioningAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityFemaleHumansLondonMalechild psychiatryepidemiologyintellectual disabilitymental healthneurodevelopmental conditionoutcome

Identifiers

PMID41319029
PMCPMC12757200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.