ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2026
Young People With and Without Intellectual Disability Accessing Mental Health Services: Evaluating Psychosocial Functioning Outcomes Using Electronic Health Records.
Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Young People With and Without Intellectual Disability Accessing Mental Health Services: Evaluating Psychosocial Functioning Outcomes Using Electronic Health Records.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is growing recognition that many young people (<18 years) with intellectual disability (ID) may benefit from psychosocial support provided by mental health services, yet intervention outcomes have not been robustly evaluated.
methodData from 1986 episodes of care for young people with ID and 3968 matched episodes for those without ID were extracted from electronic health records of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2001-2023). Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS).
resultsID frequently co-occurred with other neurodevelopmental conditions and behavioural difficulties (prevalence > 50%). CGAS scores at service entry positively predicted CGAS scores at discharge; however, this association weakened in the presence of ID and co-occurring pervasive developmental disorders or hyperkinetic disorders. ID was associated with lower CGAS scores at discharge than those without ID. Within the ID group, young people with severe/profound ID and comorbidities demonstrated greater rates of improvement than those with severe/profound ID only. 20% of young people with ID showed clinically significant improvement at discharge (reliable change index ≥ 1.96). Despite this improvement, 80% of the same group continued to experience substantial impairment (CGAS < 61).
conclusionsMost young people with ID remained substantially impaired at discharge, highlighting the complexity of their needs and the importance of sustained, targeted support. Further research should examine specific intervention types and treatment trajectories in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.