Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318972›Full record

ArticleNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2026

Barriers to timely nutrition support in patients with cancer: A scoping review.

Francesca Tabacchi, Thomas Mitaras, Vasiliki Iatridi, Jonathan Tammam, Eila Watson, Shelly Coe

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Barriers to timely nutrition support in patients with cancer: A scoping review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca TabacchiCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Science, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7998-5513
Thomas MitarasCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Science, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Vasiliki IatridiCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Science, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Jonathan TammamCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Science, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1790-5397
Eila WatsonThe Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford, UK.
Shelly CoeCentre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health & Life Science, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical cancer settings, malnutrition can go undiagnosed and patients often receive nutrition care only after they have lost substantial weight or developed severe side effects. Neglecting to provide nutrition care to a patient in a timely manner can lead to increased difficulties in supporting them and to poorer clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to identify the barriers to timely nutrition support for patients with cancer before and during medical treatment. PubMed and CINAHL platforms were used to search for relevant published literature in June 2022. The search was updated in January 2025. Advanced search was used using the terms "cancer," "malnutrition," "nutritional support," and their synonyms in combination with "under-recognition" and associated synonyms. The protocol was prospectively registered on OSF Open Science. A total of 4584 records were identified in the databases, and 41 abstracts were selected for full article screening. A total of 19 articles were included in the review. Evidence from the studies indicates that malnutrition identification and dietetic support are not always implemented in current practice. Identified barriers were grouped into four interconnected macro themes: educational barriers, communication barriers, resource barriers, and sociocultural barriers. This scoping review identifies four barriers to early nutrition support in oncological settings and discusses their implications and how they influence each other. Clinical governance should consider and look to address all barriers when trying to implement dietetic support or design pathways in a timely and efficient manner.

Indexed as

MalnutritionNeoplasmsNutritional SupportTime-to-TreatmentCommunication BarriersHumansdietetic referralslate referralsmalnutritionnutrition supportoncologyservice implementationservice provision

Identifiers

PMID41318972
PMCPMC12982639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.