Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318943›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Biocompatible Ink Optimization Enables Functional Volumetric Bioprinting With Xolography.

Erik Brauer, Aiste Balciunaite, Matthias R Kollert, Julian Weihs, Raphael S Knecht, Rose Behncke, Susanna Quach, Niklas Felix König, Asia Badolato, Stella Monestier and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond monolayers: a comparative analysis of 2D cell cultures and 3DFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Erik BrauerCenter for the Science of Materials Berlin (CSMB) and Department of Chemistry, Humboldt University, 12489, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5840-0520
Aiste BalciunaiteSoft Robotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Tannenstrasse 3, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9645-9868
Matthias R KollertJulius Wolff Institute - Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Julian WeihsDepartment of Pediatrics Division of Gastroenterology, Nephrology and Metabolic Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Raphael S KnechtJulius Wolff Institute - Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Rose BehnckeBIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Susanna QuachDepartment of Pediatrics Division of Gastroenterology, Nephrology and Metabolic Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Niklas Felix Königxolo GmbH, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
Asia BadolatoSoft Robotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Tannenstrasse 3, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.
Stella MonestierRegenerative Medicine Division, Institute for Translational Research (IRT), Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana and Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Chiesa 5, 6900, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Simone BersiniRegenerative Medicine Division, Institute for Translational Research (IRT), Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana and Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Chiesa 5, 6900, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Matteo MorettiRegenerative Medicine Division, Institute for Translational Research (IRT), Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana and Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Chiesa 5, 6900, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Miriam FilippiSoft Robotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Tannenstrasse 3, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9651-406X
René HägerlingBIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Milad RezvaniBIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan HechtCenter for the Science of Materials Berlin (CSMB) and Department of Chemistry, Humboldt University, 12489, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6124-0222
Ansgar PetersenJulius Wolff Institute - Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3075-4300
Robert K KatzschmannSoft Robotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Tannenstrasse 3, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7143-7259

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 50WM2446Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RE 3749/2-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: CRC1444Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: Project-Nr.427826188European Research Council 101054501European Research Council ERC-2021-ADGNovartis Foundation for medical-biological Research 24B139Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSII5_216727Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSK-2_221397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xolography is a novel linear volumetric manufacturing technique that offers unparalleled precision and speed. Yet, its application to bioprinting remains limited due to insufficient understanding of biocompatibility constraints. Here, this work establishes fundamental design principles for cell-compatible Xolography bioinks by dissecting the effects of extracellular pH, osmolality, and lysosomotropic stress on cell viability and function. By systematically studying the tolerances for these parameters, this work defines a framework for bioink formulations that enables fast, support-free fabrication of complex designs with maintained cell viability and function as validated in different murine and human cell lines, primary human cells and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cells. These results show that, unlike triethanolamine, BisTris indeed can function as a fully biocompatible co-initiator enabling cell viability beyond 90% as well as uncompromised metabolic activity and differentiation performance when used in a tightly controlled formulation, contrasting previous reports. This work showcases the biomedical potential of the formulation by achieving fibroblast-driven extracellular matrix (ECM) formation, endothelial sprouting from pre-vascularized spheroids, and maintenance of an iPSC-derived hepatocyte differentiation phenotype within Xolography-printed constructs. These advancements transform Xolography into a powerful and foremost reliable bioprinting platform for fabrication of complex, cell-laden structures for versatile applications in tissue engineering, organ-on-a-chip models, and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBioprintingInkAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineCell SurvivalExtracellular MatrixHepatocytesHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMicePrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materials3D printingbiohybrid roboticsbioprintingtissue engineeringXolography

Identifiers

PMID41318943
PMCPMC12848640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.