Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318879›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology2025

Shifting treatment goals in myeloproliferative neoplasms: focusing on polycythemia vera.

Keita Kirito

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keita KiritoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-shi, Yamanashi, Japan. kirito@yamanashi.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5682-2132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

JAK2V617F is the major driver mutation in polycythemia vera, and detection of this mutation is one of the most important keys for the diagnosis of this disease. In addition, JAK2V617F mutation is highlighted as a molecular marker for monitoring treatment. Clinical studies of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib and two recently introduced new forms of alfa interferon, pegylated interferon alfa 2b and ropeginterferon alfa 2b, demonstrated that treatment with these agents induced a molecular response, defined as a more than 50% reduction in the JAK2V617F allele burden from baseline, in approximately 60% of patients. In addition, some patients achieved a complete molecular response, defined as the disappearance of the mutation. More importantly, achievement of a molecular response was positively correlated with improved thrombosis-free and progression-free survival in PV patients. To date, controlling hematological parameters, especially maintaining hematocrit levels below 45%, has been the gold standard surrogate endpoint in PV treatment. With new treatment options and knowledge, molecular response should be incorporated as a new therapeutic surrogate endpoint in the management of PV.

Indexed as

JAK2V617F allele burdenMolecular responsePolycythemia veraRopeg interferon-alfa-2bRuxolitinib

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.