Trial reportScientific reports2025
Simethicone dosages with minimal normal saline solution volume to enhance mucosal visualization in upper endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premedication with simethicone before esophagogastroduodenoscopy improves mucosal visibility, but the appropriate dose remains unclear. This placebo-controlled trial compared 3 simethicone doses administered 15-30 min before esophagogastroduodenoscopy. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (1 June 2024-31 January 2025), 268 patients were assigned to placebo (n = 66) or simethicone (40 mg (n = 67) 80 mg (n = 67) or 160 mg (n = 68)). Each dose was diluted with normal saline solution to 2.4 ml. Mucosal visibility from the esophagus to the duodenum was assessed using validated scoring systems. The primary outcome was the total mucosal visibility score, while the secondary outcomes were procedure duration, amount of additional simethicone required, and patient satisfaction. All simethicone groups had lower total mucosal visibility scores than placebo (9.9 ± 1.4, 10.1 ± 1.7, and 9.9 ± 1.2 vs 14.2 ± 2.7; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed among simethicone doses. Procedure durations were shorter in all simethicone arms (2.89-2.96 min) compared with placebo (3.63 min; P < 0.001). The additional simethicone administered was minimal in all simethicone groups, and patient satisfaction scores did not differ. Simethicone doses of 40, 80, and 160 mg with minimal normal saline solution improved mucosal visibility and modestly reduced procedure time compared with placebo. No dose-related differences were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.