Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318875›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Simethicone dosages with minimal normal saline solution volume to enhance mucosal visualization in upper endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Sereephap Saeung, Thotsaporn Morasert, Panakorn Wannawong, Chayanis Kositamongkol, Pochamana Phisalprapa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sereephap SaeungDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Surat Thani Hospital, Surat Thani, 84000, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4437-928X
Thotsaporn MorasertDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Surat Thani Hospital, Surat Thani, 84000, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3353-2033
Panakorn WannawongDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Surat Thani Hospital, Surat Thani, 84000, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7488-6686
Chayanis KositamongkolDivision of Ambulatory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7182-0733
Pochamana PhisalprapaDivision of Ambulatory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. a.pochamana@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premedication with simethicone before esophagogastroduodenoscopy improves mucosal visibility, but the appropriate dose remains unclear. This placebo-controlled trial compared 3 simethicone doses administered 15-30 min before esophagogastroduodenoscopy. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (1 June 2024-31 January 2025), 268 patients were assigned to placebo (n = 66) or simethicone (40 mg (n = 67) 80 mg (n = 67) or 160 mg (n = 68)). Each dose was diluted with normal saline solution to 2.4 ml. Mucosal visibility from the esophagus to the duodenum was assessed using validated scoring systems. The primary outcome was the total mucosal visibility score, while the secondary outcomes were procedure duration, amount of additional simethicone required, and patient satisfaction. All simethicone groups had lower total mucosal visibility scores than placebo (9.9 ± 1.4, 10.1 ± 1.7, and 9.9 ± 1.2 vs 14.2 ± 2.7; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed among simethicone doses. Procedure durations were shorter in all simethicone arms (2.89-2.96 min) compared with placebo (3.63 min; P < 0.001). The additional simethicone administered was minimal in all simethicone groups, and patient satisfaction scores did not differ. Simethicone doses of 40, 80, and 160 mg with minimal normal saline solution improved mucosal visibility and modestly reduced procedure time compared with placebo. No dose-related differences were observed.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, Digestive SystemSaline SolutionSimethiconeAdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSaline SolutionSimethiconeEsophagogastroduodenoscopyMucosal visibilityPremedicationRandomized controlled trialSimethicone dosage

Identifiers

PMID41318875
PMCPMC12775499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.