ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Single-center prospective experience with Optilume
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon (OptilumeMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrethral stricture disease remains a challenging condition in urology, particularly in cases with recurrent anterior urethral narrowing following prior endoscopic treatments. Traditional options such as dilation and direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) are limited by high failure rates. The Optilume
objectiveTo evaluate the short-term functional outcomes and safety of Optilume DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis was a prospective single-center study including 35 male patients with anterior urethral strictures ≤ 3 cm and at least one prior endoscopic treatment. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcomes included changes in Qmax (uroflowmetry), post-void residual (PVR), IPSS, and erectile function (IIEF-5). Recurrence was defined as symptomatic deterioration, Qmax < 10 mL/s, or need for retreatment. Paired t-tests were used for pre- and post-treatment comparisons, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. As this was an exploratory pilot study, no formal sample size calculation was performed; analyses were descriptive and hypothesis-generating. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean Qmax improved from 10.2 ± 4.9 to 21.6 ± 3.1 mL/s (p < 0.001), and PVR decreased from 74.6 ± 36.3 to 24.8 ± 16.0 mL (p < 0.001). IPSS improved from 21.8 ± 4.8 to 8.7 ± 2.0 (p < 0.0001), and IIEF-5 scores increased from 13.7 ± 7.7 to 18.5 ± 7.6 (p = 0.012). The recurrence rate at 6 months was 8.6% (3/35). Minor adverse events included transient hematuria and dysuria. No Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications were recorded. Study limitations include its single-arm, non-randomized design and relatively short follow-up, limiting direct comparison with DVIU, urethroplasty, or emerging minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs).
conclusionsOptilume
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.