Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318801›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Social bonds decrease epigenetic age in male bottlenose dolphins.

Livia Gerber, Katharina J Peters, Stephanie L King, Simon J Allen, Richard C Connor, Owen Forbes, Kathryn G Holmes, Anna M Kearns, Erik P Willems, Michael Krützen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Livia GerberEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. livia.gerber@csiro.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1247-2262
Katharina J PetersMarine Vertebrate Ecology Lab, Environmental Futures, School of Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5967-0928
Stephanie L KingSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-9185
Simon J AllenEvolutionary Genetics Group, Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-8143
Richard C ConnorBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, MA, USA.
Owen ForbesNational Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-8279
Kathryn G HolmesSchool of Biological Sciences, Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8080-3385
Anna M KearnsAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-7442
Erik P WillemsEvolutionary Genetics Group, Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7555-3484
Michael KrützenEvolutionary Genetics Group, Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-5299
Lee A RollinsEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3279-7005

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) P2ZHP3_200011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageing is a universal process characterised by the deterioration of functional traits over an individual's lifespan. Differing degrees of age-related decline between individuals of the same chronological age suggest varying rates of ageing. Identifying factors influencing these inter-individual differences in 'biological age' is central to understanding ageing. In social mammals, social variables affect lifespan and are therefore likely to affect biological age. In Shark Bay, Western Australia, male bottlenose dolphins forge persisting intrasexual social bonds that affect their reproductive success and, therefore, their evolutionary fitness. We investigate the relationship between cumulative social bond strength, group size, and biological age of individual male dolphins in this population. Biological age is inferred using a species-specific epigenetic clock, the current gold standard for such an inference. We find a significant negative effect of cumulative social bond strength and a significant positive effect of group size. This implies that the negative effect of social bonds on epigenetic age cannot be attributed solely to group-living, but to benefits of the social bonds themselves. As established in humans, we find that the strength of social relationships affects epigenetic age, indicating that sociality may be linked to biological ageing more broadly across social mammals.

Indexed as

AgingBottle-Nosed DolphinEpigenesis, GeneticSocial BehaviorAnimalsMale

Identifiers

PMID41318801
PMCPMC12700864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.