Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318767›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel four-serum marker model for early detection and therapeutic monitoring of breast cancer.

Shang Chen, Jianling Zeng, Ke Gong, Yaru Liu, Shoubin Long, Li Han, Dixian Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shang ChenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of the Research and Development of Novel Pharmaceutical Preparations, Hunan Provincial University Key Laboratory of the Fundamental and Clinical Research on Functional Nucleic Acid, The First Clinical College, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, 410219, P. R. China.
Jianling ZengTranslational Medicine Institute, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, University of South China, Hengyang, 423000, P. R. China.
Ke GongTranslational Medicine Institute, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, University of South China, Hengyang, 423000, P. R. China.
Yaru LiuLaboratory Medicine Centre, Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518052, P. R. China.
Shoubin LongLaboratory Medicine Centre, Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518052, P. R. China.
Li HanHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of the Research and Development of Novel Pharmaceutical Preparations, Hunan Provincial University Key Laboratory of the Fundamental and Clinical Research on Functional Nucleic Acid, The First Clinical College, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, 410219, P. R. China. 524675905@qq.com.
Dixian LuoLaboratory Medicine Centre, Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518052, P. R. China. luo_dixian@email.szu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund Enterprise Joint Fund 2022A1515220042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) remains pivotal for enhancing patient outcomes, yet current imaging modalities face inherent limitations. This retrospective study, encompassing 1366 BC patients and 1186 healthy controls (HC) from Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital (2022-2025), developed and validated a serum tumor marker-based predictive model to address this gap. Eight markers-CEA, AFP, CA199, CA242, CA15-3, CA125, FER, and NSE-were analyzed, with multivariate logistic regression identifying AFP, CA242, CA15-3, and NSE as independent diagnostic predictors. The resulting four-marker panel demonstrated robust performance, achieving an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89-0.92) with 77.3% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity in the development cohort (n = 1535), and sustained efficacy in validation (AUC = 0.82, 87.5% sensitivity, 72.8% specificity; n = 761). The model effectively stratified early-stage (T1/T2: 86.49% accuracy) versus advanced-stage (T3/T4: 92.00%) tumors, lymph node involvement (N0: 86.49%; N+: 88.00%), metastatic status (M0: 87.32%; M+: 85.71%), and molecular subtypes (Luminal A: 91.33%; Luminal B: 82.35%; HER2+: 84.61%; triple-negative: 87.75%). Notably, longitudinal risk score trends correlated with therapeutic response, declining in remission and rising with progression. These findings collectively highlight the model's dual utility as a high-accuracy diagnostic tool for early BC detection and a dynamic biomarker for monitoring treatment efficacy. This novel model may provide an auxiliary approach in current screening paradigms, underscoring its transformative potential in oncology practice.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerEfficacy assessmentPredictive modelPreoperative diagnosisSerum tumor marker

Identifiers

PMID41318767
PMCPMC12775509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.